Figure 1: Percentage of my happiness due to subjects responses after treatment as a function of the expenses of the treatment. Expenses have been normalized to subject one .
Conclusions:
wth??!!!11
b_(^.^)_d /*Thumbs up*/
EXP Podcast #756: This Is My Favorite Xbox on the Citadel
-
*No. That's a phone. *According to Microsoft you probably have an Xbox in
your pocket. So what's an Xbox again? This week on the podcast we chat
Microso...
1 week ago
3 comments:
500% happiness? is that possible?
And negative happiness?
Anyways, if you had read the book I sent you, you would know that spending too much in someone you are not officially dating, will freak them out. :-P They call it cat string theory.
Read the book!
:-P
we need to teleconference. :-D
Well, I need to clarify the happiness axis. It is actually 500% success if 100% was the plan. So 500% meant it was kind of a surprise, a nice one. And even if it went all as plan (100%, except I didn't wanted to hit that child ice skating >.<) if it was nicer, then I also increased a bit... basically I'm saying I came up with the values as whatever the hell I wanted them :D
As for the cat string theory you should stop quoting it every time.
It is the same as the squash ball analogy, just less aggressive ... everyone knows it, so give me something useful.
If I want to hear about cat related theory, it better be Schrodinger's cat next time, on a Portal related topic... or Futurama will also be valid.
Post a Comment